Pinkflash's Crisis Communication from the Perspective of Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT)

Komunikasi Krisis Pinkflash dalam Perspektif Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT)

Authors

  • Dian Rahmawati Agustina Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Rhesa Zuhriya Briyan Pratiwi Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Keywords:

Crisis Communication, Situational Crisis Communication Theory, Cosmetic Brands, TikTok, Content Analysis

Abstract

The crisis of public trust resulting from the findings of the Food and Drug Monitoring Agency (BPOM) has become a major challenge for the cosmetics industry on social media. This study aims to examine and describe the crisis communication strategy through the perspective of Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) implemented by Pinkflash through its official TikTok media, in order to restore its reputation. This study uses a qualitative method with content analysis according to Philipp Mayring. The research data consists of crisis communication content on the @pinkflash.beauty account collected through documentation of Pinkflash TikTok media content, literature studies, and digital observations of several Pinkflash TikTok algorithms, and tested using data triangulation. The results of the study indicate a shift in crisis communication that begins with a rebuild strategy and ends with a defensive deny strategy. Among these various responses, the diminish strategy is the dominant category used to minimize corporate responsibility. However, the action of disabling comments is considered to violate the dialogical principle of the international human code of ethics. In conclusion, the combination of these strategies plays a significant role in isolating the crisis and controlling the public narrative, although its ethical transparency aspect is questionable for maintaining business continuity.

References

Apriliani, R. (2024a). 10 Brand Kecantikan Terlaris Jelang Lebaran 2024, Produk Lokal Banyak Jadi Favorit! Retrieved July 26, 2025, from 15 April 2024 website: https://www.beautynesia.id/beauty/10-brand-kecantikan-terlaris-jelang- lebaran-2024-produk-lokal-banyak-jadi-favorit/b-288464

Apriliani, R. (2024b). Ini Klarifikasi Pinkflash Usai 3 Produknya Dinyatakan Berbahaya oleh BPOM RI. Retrieved July 26, 2026, from 2 Desember 2024 website: https://www.beautynesia.id/beauty/ini-klarifikasi-pinkflash-usai-3-produknya-dinyatakan-berbahaya-oleh-bpom-ri/b-298219

Aryantini, N. P. D., & Dewi, N. K. R. K. (2024). Efektivitas Peranan BPOM Dalam Pengawasan Peredaran Kosmetik Ilegal Di Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Hukum Mahasiswa, 4(2), 1719–1736. Doi: https://doi.org/10.36733/jhm.v1i2

Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., & Kong, Y. (2022). The state of social-mediated crisis communication research through the lens of global scholars: An updated assessment. Public Relations Review, 48(2), 102172. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102172

Claeys, A. S., Cauberghe, V., & Vyncke, P. (2010). Restoring reputations in times of crisis: An experimental study of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the moderating effects of locus of control. Public Relations Review, 36(3), 256–262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.05.004

Consumeri. (2025). Pinkflash Kembali Bermasalah: Kesalahan Sekali Bisa Dimaklumi, Dua Kali Menjadi Bukti Ada yang Salah. Retrieved July 26, 2026, from 16 Desember 2025 website: https://consumeri.id/pinkflash-kembali-bermasalah-kesalahan-sekali-bisa-dimaklumi-dua-kali-menjadi-bukti-ada-yang-salah/

Coombs, W. T. (2007). Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Coombs, W. T. (2015). Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Djafarova, E., & Bowes, T. (2021). 'Instagram made me buy it': Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102345. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102345

Farbadi, M. P., & Suherman. (2025). The Liability of Cosmetics Business Operators For The Impact of Hazardous Product: Pinkflash Cosmetics Brand on Consumers. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 676–684. Doi: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2621

Heath, R. L. (2010). The SAGE handbook of public relations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kementerian Perindustrian. (2025, February 19). Kemenperin gadang potensi industri kosmetik semakin gemilang. Retrieved from https://ikm.kemenperin.go.id/kemenperin-gadang-potensi-industri-kosmetik-semakin-gemilang

Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2016). From Homo Economicus to Homo Dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 60–67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.003

Kim, S., & Woo, H. (2021). Global fashion retailers' responses to external and internal crises during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fashion and Textiles, 8(1), 1-26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-021-00260-x

Liu, B. F., Austin, L., & Jin, Y. (2011). How publics respond to crisis communication strategies: The interplay of information form and source. Public Relations Review, 37(4), 345-353. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.004

Loahandi, A. P. (2024, December 12). TikTok vs Instagram: Siapa yang lebih menguasai waktu dan perhatian? GoodStats Data. Retrieved from https://data.goodstats.id/statistic/tiktok-vs-instagram-siapa-yang-lebih-menguasai-waktu-dan-perhatian-PkQgO

Maheswara, R. (2025, 25 Desember). Indonesia masih jadi negara pengguna TikTok terbanyak di dunia pada Oktober 2025. Dataloka. Diambil dari https://dataloka.id/humaniora/5190/indonesia-masih-jadi-negara-pengguna-tiktok-terbanyak-di-dunia-pada-oktober-2025/

Ofong, S. (2024). Pengaruh Electronic Word Of Mouth (E-WOM) Dan Fitur Live Streaming Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Produk Kosmetik Pinkflash Pada Marketplace Shopee (Universitas Jambi). Universitas Jambi. Retrieved from https://repository.unja.ac.id/id/eprint/75518

Pinkflash. (2026). @pinkflash.beauty [TikTok]. Retrieved July 26, 2026, from https://www.tiktok.com/@pinkflash.beauty

Puspitawati, D., & Apriliani, R. (2026). Strategi Respon PT Pertamina pada Krisis Dugaan Oplosan Pertamax dalam Pemberitaan Kompas.com dan CNN Indonesia: Analisis Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT). MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(2), 1090-1104. Doi: https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v5i2.7582

Putri, A., & Hadian, A. (2025). Pengaruh Beauty Vlogger Marketing, Brand Awareness Dan Word Of Mouth Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Produk Pink Flash (Studi Kasus Pada Masyarakat Delitua Timur). Movere Journal, 7(2), 506-521. Doi: https://doi.org/10.53654/mv.v7i2.664

Rahmatia, A. (2026). Strategi Komunikasi Persuasif Pink Flash dalam Mengatasi Kritik Publik di Tiktok (Studi Kasus pada Konten Klarifikasi). Crossroad Research Journal, 3(3), 32-47. Doi: https://doi.org/10.61402/crj.v3i3.537

Rahmawati, R. F., Aqmala, D., Sedayu, A., & Cahya, H. N. (2025). Peran kepercayaan dalam meningkatkan keputusan pembelian produk Pinkflash. Jurnal Manajemen Sosial Ekonomi (Dinamika), 5(2), 1-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.51903/mnbvzp0 2

Ramadhani, B. (2025). Strategi respons krisis pada akun TikTok @hulmofficial berdasarkan SCCT dalam kasus black campaign oleh kompetitor. Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(6), 4150-4163. Doi: https://doi.org/10.63822/w0hhvc70

Ramadhania, P., Hurairah, H., & Aprianto, S. (2026). Analysis Of Civil Legal Responsibility Of Dangerous Skincare Sellers Towards Consumers (Case Study Of The Distribution Of Pinkflash Brand Cosmetics In Bengkulu). Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 12(1), 205-208. Doi: https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10814

Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43-55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590904571

Sanjaya, Y. C. A. (2025). BPOM Temukan 23 Kosmetik Mengandung Bahan Berbahaya. Retrieved July 26, 2026, from 4 November 2025 website: https://www.kompas.com/jawa-tengah/read/2025/11/04/080000488/bpom-temukan-23-kosmetik-mengandung-bahan-berbahaya-berikut-daftar?page=all

Schultz, F., Utz, S., & Göritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via Twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 20-27. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001

Septiani, A. T., & Irwansyah, I. (2026). Revealing Netizen’s Responses to The Withdrawal of Dangerous Producst: A Case Study of Pinkflash Cosmetics. Journal Analitica Islamica, 15(2), 503-513. Doi: https://doi.org/10.30829/jai.v15i2.28863

Surahmat, A., Dida, S., & Zubair, F. (2021). Analysis of the Government's Crisis Communication Strategy Discourse to Defend Covid-19. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(1), 36-53. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24912/jk.v13i1.9272

Suryani, U. H., Anggita, I. A., & Ramadhan, D. O. (2025). Manajemen Krisis Public Relations Pinkflash: Dampak Pencabutan Izin Edar terhadap Citra Merek melalui Analisis Sentimen. Filosofi : Publikasi Ilmu Komunikasi, Desain, Seni Budaya, 2(4), 55-72. Doi: https://doi.org/10.62383/filosofi.v2i4.996

Ugahari, G. A. A., & Apriliani, R. (2025). Analisis Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) pada Strategi Komunikasi Krisis Brand Erspo dalam Kasus Kontroversi Jersey Timnas Indonesia. MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(3), 1000-1012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v4i3.5362

Wijaya, A. Z., Nuraini, D., Wijaya, F. Y., & Sumarni, L. (2025). Analisis manajemen krisis brand Pink Flash dalam kasus penemuan bahan berbahaya oleh BPOM. KAIS Kajian Ilmu Sosial, 6(2), 49-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24853/kais.6.2.49-54

Zhou, Z., Zhang, X., & Ki, E.-J. (2022). Crisis response strategy manipulation: A systematic review and a test of nuances. Public Relations Review, 48(3), 102208. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102208

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29

Issue

Section

Articles