The Appeal of Mpu Purwa Museum as an Educational Tourism Destination: A Communication Perspective
Daya Tarik Museum Mpu Purwa sebagai Wisata Edukasi dalam Perspektif Komunikasi
Keywords:
Mpu Purwa Museum, Educational Tourism, Tourist Attraction, Cooper's 4A Theory, Cultural Tourism DestinationAbstract
This study examines the appeal of Mpu Purwa Museum as an educational tourism destination in Malang, East Java, by emphasizing the role of communication in shaping visitors’ understanding of cultural heritage. Drawing on Cooper’s 4A framework-Attraction, Accessibility, Amenities, and Ancillary-the research explores how the museum communicates historical values through its collections, facilities, and educational programs. A qualitative approach was employed using observations, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving museum managers, public relations officers, and visitors. The findings reveal that attraction is the museum’s strongest component, with collections of ancient statues and inscriptions functioning not only as historical artifacts but also as communication media that facilitate cultural interpretation and public learning. Traditional gamelan performances further enrich visitors’ experiences by creating interactive cultural communication. Accessibility and visitor facilities support positive communication experiences by enabling convenient access and comfortable engagement with exhibitions. In addition, educational programs and partnerships with schools strengthen the museum’s role as a public communication space where cultural knowledge is disseminated, interpreted, and preserved. These findings highlight that the effectiveness of educational tourism is closely linked to the museum’s capacity to communicate heritage values through meaningful visitor experiences.
References
Anden, T. E. (2021). Masa Depan Industri Pariwisata Kota Palangka Raya (Perspektif dan Solusinya). Jurnal Penelitian UPR: Kaharati, 1(1), 9-16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.52850/jptupr.v1i1.3157
Black, G. (2012). Transforming museums in the twenty-first century. London, England: Routledge.
Bungin, B. (2015). Komunikasi Pariwisata (Tourism Communication): Pemasaran dan Brand Destinasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Chen, W., Li, T., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Embodied cognition model for museum gamification cultural heritage communication: A grounded theory study. Heritage Science, 13, 239. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-025-01821-9
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2016). The museum experience revisited. London, England: Routledge.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. London, England: Routledge.
Li, P. (2024). Cultural communication in museums: A perspective of the visitor experience. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0303026. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303026
Pitana, I G., & Diarta, I. K. S. (2009). Pengantar ilmu pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Pradini, G. (2017). Pengaruh Tourism Destination Parts, Service Quality terhadap Destination Loyalty melalui Tourist Satisfaction di Taman Margasatwa Ragunan. Jurnal Eksekutif, 14(1), 136-159.
Setiawan, Z., Yendri, O., Kusuma, B. A., Ishak, R. P., Boari, Y., Paddiyatu, N., & Kartika, T. (2023). Buku Ajar Perencanaan Dan Pengembangan Pariwisata. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage Routledge. London: Routledge
Sugiyono, P. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta,
Suhendroyono, R. N. (2016). Pengelolaan wisata alam Watu Payung sebagai ikon wisata berbasis budaya di Gunungkidul Yogyakarta. Jurnal Kepariwisataan, 10(1), 43–50.
View My Stats